RPL Review Services: Evaluate Your RPL & Avoid Rejection from ACS
We review your RPL and edit it to meet ACS Australia’s guidelines and standards. Choose RPL review services to optimise your RPL for a positive outcome!
Get Free Consultation
Looking For Someone To Review An ACS RPL Report?

Writing a unique and refined RPL report for ACS skill Assessment while maintaining standards and highlighting skills appropriately is challenging. With the proper guidance, writing the best RPL report becomes easier. Our expert team helps you craft a report that guarantees ACS approval. With an experienced team of 500+ RPL writers, we are here to help you write the RPL that gets your job done.
Leave your worry behind—take the first step towards your success and avoid delays! Avail of our professional RPL review services and guarantee your success, just like the thousands. We have a 99.9% success rate with ACS because we help IT professionals write an RPL that not only showcases their skills and knowledge in the best light but also maintains the nitty-gritty of ACS Australia Skills Assessment guidelines.

How Does Our RPL Report Reviewing Work?

Step 1: Explore Our Services & Pricing
Contact us to schedule a free consultation. Alternatively, locate the form on our website and choose the ACS RPL report review service. Our experts will ensure your report aligns with Engineers Australia (EA).

Step 2: Select & Purchase the Service
After the consultation, our team will send you a customised quotation with a detailed proposal, including a pricing breakdown and a tentative date for delivery. You can complete the payment in the best-suited way.

Step 3: RPL Review Services as per Guidelines
Our experts will review your report, suggest changes, and discuss with you. Then, they will make the changes and send you the revised version. If you require any revision, we will revise the report free of charge.
Why Choose Our Experts For RPL Review?

24/7 Support
Opportunities wait for none, so shouldn’t you! We offer 24/7 live support via live chat, email, and WhatsApp to cater to your needs quickly!

Qualified Team
We have a qualified team of RPL writers who will help you revise the report and write one that meets the EA standards and guidelines.

Premium Quality
We maintain the highest quality report because we have RPL writing experts offering services for over a decade and have a 99% satisfaction rate.

On-Time Delivery
We understand the importance of deadlines and ensure that your RPL review is completed on time and ready for submission in a timely manner.

Domain Expertise
We have RPL writing experts with expertise in more than 25 engineering domains, which helps us always provide skilled migration RPL reviews!

Affordable Services
We offer affordable services starting at AUD 99 for each RPL report review. Our services are designed to help and guide you for a positive assessment.

99% Success Rate
Our review of RPL report for ACS aims to achieve a favorable assessment. When we revise your RPL, your chances of getting approved increase 10-fold!

Strict Confidentiality
We maintain your security and privacy by encrypting all information. We also do not share your information with any third party.
Submit a Refined & Optimised Report for RPL Application Effortlessly
No need to risk rejection of your RPL assessment review. Reach out to us to get the best ACS RPL report review.
Our Additional Services
We provide professional assistance in creating CPD, Career Episode Reports, Summary Statements, and other documents for all ANZSCO Engineering occupations, as well as preparing CDR Reports for Engineering Australia. Our services include:

CDR Report Writing Services
Need help writing your CDR Report? Our experts will guide you and help you write the report, meeting all EA standards.

Career Episode Writing Services
Get help from professional writers to choose and write your career episodes and highlight your knowledge and skills effectively.

CPD Report Writing Services
Highlight your activities well in the CPD with our CPD report writing services and get EA approval without delays.

Summary Statement Writing
Meet EA standards with our professional Summary Statement report writing services so you can quickly get EA approval.

RPL Report Writing Services
Unable to write your report? With our professional ACS RPL Writing services, you can ace your assessments like never before.

ACS Skill Assessment Services
Prepare for your online skill assessment of the Australian Computer Society with our ACS SKill assessment services.
Meet the Team: Our Top RPL Experts Ready To Review Your Reports!
Qualification: IT Consultant
Engineering Experience: 10 years, Network Solutions
Writing Experience: 5 years, ACS RPL Reports
Client Review: "Her guidance made my report stand out!"
Qualification: Systems Analyst
Engineering Experience: 12 years, IT Solutions Expert
Writing Experience: 8 years, CDR and RPL Services
Client Review: "John's in-depth knowledge turned my RPL into an ACS success!"
Qualification: Information Security Expert
Engineering Experience: 11 years, Cybersecurity
Writing Experience: 7 years, CDR & ACS RPL
Client Review: "Her expertise in cybersecurity and ACS requirements was invaluable!"
Qualification: Software Developer
Engineering Experience: 14 years, Full-stack Development
Writing Experience: 6 years, Professional Report Writing
Client Review: "Fast, effective, and knowledgeable—highly recommend!"
Qualification: Data Scientist
Engineering Experience: 9 years, Data Analytics
Writing Experience: 4 years, RPL Report Revision
Client Review: "Tina's insights helped me improve my report significantly!"
More Than 2789 People Signed Up For Our RPL Report Review Services! Are You NEXT?
What Is An RPL Review Service?

A professional RPL review service helps applicants applying for the ACS prepare and refine their Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) report before submitting it to the Australian Computer Society (ACS) Skills Assessment. For individuals willing to migrate to Australia and work in an ICT-related field with no formal ICT qualification or an insufficient ICT qualification, an RPL report is a must. If you need help and wish to improve your chances for positive assessment, you can avail yourself of review services. Our RPL review service is like editorial guidance for all individuals by experienced technical writers and ICT professionals familiar with the ACS guidelines.

Here's what our RPL Review Service typically involves:
- Our experts review your report thoroughly to point out grammatical errors, unclear expressions, illogical flow, and overall presentation.
- Our experts ensure the report adheres to specific ACS guidelines, including, but not limited to, structure, format, and content.
- They also identify and pinpoint the gaps, highlight where more details should be added, and provide stronger evidence of skills and knowledge.
- Our experts check the accuracy of skills relevant to the ICT field and ensure the proper use of technical terms and technologies.
- They also check for plagiarism issues and remove them, as plagiarised content is one of the major reasons for ACS’s rejection of reports.
- They even suggest and advise on highlighting projects that best show your ICT skills and how to articulate roles and responsibilities.
In summary, their feedback and guidance help improve your chances of a positive assessment.
Why Is It Important For ACS Assessment?
In the RPL pathway, ACS skill assessment is essential for most IT professionals seeking a skill migration visa. Getting the report reviewed by experts enhances the credibility of the report for many reasons:

Avoidance of Rejection and Delays:
A review can catch potential issues leading to report rejection and delays in the migration plan. A rejected report not only delays migration plans but also results in lost work opportunities. .
Demonstrating Competency Effectively:
The RPL report shows the skills and knowledge in the best possible light. Review helps in articulating the practical skills properly and aligning them with the recognised ICT qualifications. .
Increased Chances of Positive Assessment:
Getting reports reviewed increases the chance of a positive assessment, as meeting the strict ACS standards allows experts to catch potential errors that would lead to rejection. .
Saving Time and Effort with Expert Insights:
Applicants miss crucial details when writing. Experts’ advice and suggestions help writers create compelling reports, save time and effort in preparing them, and meet standards. .
Addressing the "No ICT Qualification" Hurdle:
For applicants with no ICT qualification, a compelling report is the only shot at getting ACS approval. Reviewers help prepare a solid report to target and bridge the potential gaps. .Why Review Before Submitting The RPL Report for ACS Assessment?
Reviewing your Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) report before submitting it for an Australian Computer Society (ACS) Skills Assessment is not just a good idea; it’s practically essential for maximising your chances of a positive outcome. Here’s why:
- Gaining an Expert Perspective: Experts are not only familiar with the standards and guidelines but also have extensive knowledge of ACS assessment trends. Furthermore, they help applicants vary their technical skills and address underselling and overselling their experience.
- Strict ACS Guidelines and Requirements: ACS standards are strict, and if your report fails to meet the “Core Body of Knowledge for ICT Professionals” (CBOK) and relevant ANZSCO codes, it will be rejected. Experts ensure your report maintains every nuance of these guidelines.
- Avoiding Common Reasons for the Rejection: From plagiarism and insufficient technical detail to irrelevant experience/projects and lack of depth and breadth, experts help you write a report that not only highlights your worth but also rules out common reasons for rejection.
Furthermore, they also fix grammatical errors, align the report with the ANZSCO occupation code where ACS expects at least 65% relevancy, and save time, money, and effort because rewriting and resubmitting the report is undoubtedly an excruciating process.
What Are The Benefits Of Hiring Professionals To Review RPL For ACS?

Higher Success Rate: Significantly increases the likelihood of a positive skills assessment from ACS.
Time-Saving: Avoids rejection and subsequent resubmission delays.
Error Correction: Catches grammatical, formatting, and technical errors.
Plagiarism Prevention: Ensures your report is original and unique.
Clarity and Coherence: Improves your report’s overall readability and persuasive power.
Guidance on ANZSCO: Helps you link your experience to the ACS’s specific requirements for your nominated occupation.
Peace of Mind: Gives you confidence that your application is as strong as possible.

14 Expert Tips To Review A Quality RPL Report For Australian Skill Assessment
Here are 14 tips from our RPL experts to help you write a compelling report:
- Deep Dive into the ACS Booklet: Review the official ACS Migration Skills Assessment booklet thoroughly to grasp all RPL-specific guidelines and requirements.
- ANZSCO Code Alignment: Ensure your experience and skills are meticulously aligned with the duties outlined in your chosen ANZSCO code, demonstrating at least 65% relevance.
- Follow the RPL Form: Without deviation, strictly adhere to the exact structure and sections provided in the official ACS RPL application form.
- Clear Headings and Subheadings: Organise your report with distinct, logical headings and subheadings to enhance readability and guide the assessor.
- Professional Presentation: Maintain a high standard of professional presentation through consistent formatting, proper grammar, and error-free writing.
- Key Areas of Knowledge (KAoK): For each chosen KAoK, clearly explain your acquisition method and provide specific, practical examples of applying that knowledge.
- Project Reports (Two Required): Detail two major ICT projects, one from the last two years and one from the last four years, using the STAR method with specific technical depth.
- Personal Contributions: Emphasise and explicitly describe your roles, responsibilities, and specific achievements within each project.
- Authenticity and Originality: Guarantee that your entire report is 100% original content, free from plagiarism. Always check the report using Turnitin for peace of mind.
- Concise and Clear English: Write using precise, professional, and easily understandable English, avoiding unnecessary jargon or complex sentence structures.
- Use of Active Voice: Consistently use active voice to clearly state your direct involvement and actions (e.g., “I developed,” “I managed”).
- Demonstrate Ongoing Learning: Showcase your commitment to professional growth by illustrating how you continuously update your ICT skills and knowledge.
- Supporting Documentation Alignment: Verify that all information in your RPL report is perfectly consistent with your employment references and other submitted documents.
- Feedback and Iteration: Seek constructive feedback on your draft report from multiple sources and be prepared to revise it thoroughly before submission.
What Is The Currency Of Evidence For RPL?
Currency of evidence refers to requirements that the skills and knowledge you demonstrate are up-to-date, relevant to current industry practices, and reflective of your current competency when preparing an RPL report. Here’s a breakdown of the key aspects of currency of evidence:
Recent Timeframe:
- Project Reports: You must complete and mention 2 projects in your report. One project must be completed within the last 2 years and the previous four years. For instance, if you are writing a report in 2025, one project must be completed in 2023 and the other in 2021. This is to show that your experience, skill, and knowledge are fresh and relevant.
- Relevant Work Experience: Though ACS considers your entire work history and experience, your most recent experience holds significant weight compared to the old ones. Your projects must be ongoing or recently completed projects (in the 2 years).
- Professional Currency Evidence: ACS mandates that you complete at least two forms of evidence showing your skill and currency in the nominated ANZSCO code(s) within two years. This generally includes professional artefacts (publications, code, etc.), vendor certifications, or professional development activities (workshops, seminars).
Industry Standards:
- Current Practices: Your report must show your knowledge of current industry standards, methodologies, and best practices. Thus, mention modern software development lifecycles (e.g., Agile, DevOps), relevant security protocols, cloud technologies, or current programming paradigms, if applicable to your role.
- Problem-Solving Skills: You must showcase how your solutions address current challenges and requirements in the ICT industry.
- Tool and Technology Versions: When describing tools and technology, do not mention their names but instead mention the versions or specific contexts that reflect current usage rather than outdated systems.
Relevance to the Qualification:
- ANZSCO Alignment: The evidence you provide in the report must be directly relevant to your chosen ANZSCO code.
- ICT Core Body of Knowledge (CBOK): While you may not have a formal qualification, your RPL report must show that your acquired knowledge aligns with the ACS’s ICT Core Body of Knowledge.
- Specific Competencies: Each piece of evidence should clearly link to and support the specific competencies and knowledge areas required for your occupation.
Demonstrates Current Competency:
- Active Application: Since it’s not enough to simply learn a skill, you must show you can perform it effectively. Therefore, your report must show that you actively use and apply your ICT skills in your current or most recent roles.
- Practical Examples: This is where the detailed project reports come in. They provide primary evidence of your current competence by describing real-world scenarios where you applied your skills to solve problems and achieve outcomes.
- Continuous Professional Development (CPD): Mentioning recent training, certifications, workshops, professional memberships, or self-study (especially those completed in the last two years) helps show your commitment to staying current and maintaining your competency in the rapidly evolving ICT field.
What Are The Key Areas Checked During An RPL Report Review?
Our experts review your RPL report for the following key areas:
- Adherence to Format: Is the report strictly following the latest guidelines provided by the ACS RPL Form structure, headings, and subheadings?
- Eligibility Criteria: Does the applicant meet the minimum work experience requirements set by ACS for the RPL pathway?
- Document Checklist: Have all required sections of the form been completed, and are the supporting documents clearly identified, or is there any missing element?
- Relevance: Does the applicant’s overall work experience, and especially the project details, align at least 65% with the specific duties and responsibilities of the chosen ANZSCO code, essential for RPL process?
- Accuracy of Choice: Has the most appropriate ANZSCO code been selected given the applicant’s primary ICT skills and experience?
- Timeframes: Are the two project reports within the correct timeframe (one in the last 2 years, one in the last 4 years from application date)?
- STAR Method Application: Is each project detailed using the Situation, Task, Action, Result (STAR) method effectively?
- Completeness: Have all required KAoK areas been addressed as per ACS guidelines?
- Depth: Is the explanation sufficient to convey a solid understanding, not just a superficial one?
- Overall Flow and Cohesion: Do the different sections (KAoK, projects) link together logically and support the overall claim of competency for the nominated ANZSCO?
How Do We Review RPL Reports: The Step-By-Step Process
Step 1: Initial Consultation & Document Submission
Once our expert receives your documents, we will schedule an initial consultation (often via call or email). During this, our RPL reviewing service for Australia team will understand your background, career trajectory, the specific ANZSCO code you’re targeting, and any concerns about your report.
Step 2: Comprehensive Review Against ACS Guidelines
- Our expert team will meticulously review your report, focusing on the ACS guidelines for ICT professionals.
- This review includes checking the format, word limits, document types, and translations. They will also check if your report matches the 65% relevance rule per the chosen ANZSCO code.
Key Areas of Knowledge (KAoK) Assessment:
- Do your explanations adequately demonstrate your understanding of the chosen Essential Core ICT Knowledge and General ICT Knowledge areas?
- Have you provided concrete examples from your experience to support your claims in each subtopic?
- Is the depth and breadth of your knowledge sufficiently demonstrated?
Step 3: Detailed RPL Report Editing and Feedback
- Being a premium RPL review service provider, we write the RPL report feedback for you, so you can assess the araes need imporvement in the report and submit a perfect one for positive assessment from ACS.
Step 4: Revision and Iteration (as per service agreement)
- When you sign up with us to get RPL review services for guaranteed positive assessment from the Australian Computer Society, we revise and present the RPL report in a completely new way which is edited according to ACS guidelines.
Step 5: Final Approval and Submission Guidance
- Our team of professional writers and RPL reviewers will also guide you on RPL evaluation and ACS skill migration.
How Much Does An RPL Review Service Typically Cost and What Is Included?
We offer multiple packages for the RPL report checking service. The pricing table below allows you to select the tier that works best for you. Therefore, choose the package according to your urgency and budget.
RPL Review | 15 Days plan (AUD) | 10 Days plan (AUD) | 7 Days plan (AUD) |
---|---|---|---|
RPL Editing and Proofreading | $199 | $299 | $379 |
RPL Proofreading | $99 | $149 | $199 |
Complete RPL Report Rewriting | $499 | $699 | $849 |
RPL Plagiarism Checker & Removal | $149 | $249 | $299 |
RPL Plagiarism Check | $79 |
Frequently Asked Questions
How Does a Professional RPL Review Help Increase the Chances of ACS Approval?
A professional RPL review significantly increases the chances of ACS approval. The experts improve structure, write according to the ACS requirements, and present the applicant’s skills and experience in the best light. They also check if your report meets the ethical standards. Furthermore, our RPL experts enhance your report’s credibility by highlighting your work’s most essential and relevant aspects. Resultantly, all this improves your chances and saves your time and cost.
Can I Submit My RPL Report without Getting It Professionally Reviewed?
You can submit your RPL report without getting it reviewed by a professional. However, we strongly discourage doing so because the ACS RPL (Recognition of Prior Learning) report can be rejected if formatted or written poorly. Evidently, if your report is rejected, you cannot submit it for a skill migration visa application. Furthermore, you will have to pay the reassessment fees.
Do RPL Review Services Also Check for Plagiarism Or Duplicate Content?
Yes! We check for plagiarism and eliminate it. Further, we improve the content and better highlight your relevant and most recent project. We also provide a Turnitin report proving the quality. Since the Australian Computer Society uses Turnitin to check for plagiarism, our report gives you an edge and peace of mind.
Is the RPL Review Service Suitable for Non-It Graduates Applying to ACS?
Indeed it is! Our ACS RPL review service is for all who need to review their report to ensure acceptance by ACS. Therefore, you can share your report with us, and our RPL report writer in the relevant field will work on it and revise it accordingly.
What Documents Do I Need to Submit for an RPL Report Review?
You must provide us with your complete RPL report and personal identification documents, such as your passport, birth certificate, and evidence number (if applicable). We also need your academic transcripts, awards, certifications, updated CV, and employment letter.
How Long Does It Take to Review an RPL Report Professionally?
It takes up to 15 days to review an RPL report. With that being said, we do have an expedited process. Therefore, if you need quicker, inform us during the consultation so we can help you in the best possible way.
Why Risk Your Future with Amateurs?
Get expert-written RPL reports tailored for ACS Australia approval. Contact us now for a Free Assessment!
Qualification: Software Engineer
Engineering Experience: 15 years, Cloud Architect
Writing Experience: 6 years, RPL & CDR Report Writing
Client Review: "Highly professional and insightful in providing RPL solutions!"